Checklist: What to Look for in a Modern Artwork Automation Platform

In regulated industries, the label is your last line of defense—and your first impression.
Legacy tools can’t keep up with today’s compliance, speed, and scale demands. This checklist walks you through what truly defines a modern, intelligent artwork automation platform—from AI-powered proofing and regulatory enforcement to scalable global collaboration.
If you’re in pharma, CPG, or medical devices, this is the guide you can’t afford to skip.

In regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and consumer packaged goods (CPG), packaging is not just design—it’s a critical function tied to safety, compliance, and reputation. One wrong label can result in recalls, regulatory action, or worse, patient harm. As global compliance demands and product portfolios grow more complex, legacy processes fall short. The need for automation is no longer a nice-to-have efficiency measure; it’s a competitive necessity.

This checklist breaks down what defines a modern, AI-powered artwork automation platform for packaging and labelling—and how to evaluate one that fits the rigorous needs of regulated markets that you operate in.

  1. Intelligent Proofing and Error Detection

Why it matters: Human oversight alone is no match for the volume and precision needed in regulated artwork production. Typos, colour mismatches, dieline errors, or outdated regulatory copy can sneak through even in high-functioning teams. The result? Costly recalls, compliance violations, and reputational damage.

What to look for:

  • AI-driven content comparison: Can the platform automatically compare the approved source file to the final artwork using OCR and image recognition? It should highlight text changes, font mismatches, and layout shifts.
  • Colour and dyeline validation: It must detect technical errors—wrong Pantone codes, placement deviations, or faulty barcodes.
  • Automated compliance flagging: The system should proactively catch potential compliance violations based on pre-set rules or regulatory templates.

Takeaway: Choose a platform that acts like a second set of eyes—faster, more accurate, and tireless.

  1. End-to-End Collaboration in a Unified Workspace

Why it matters: Labelling and artwork development involves multiple stakeholders – regulatory, marketing, legal, quality, packaging vendors. When teams rely on fragmented tools, email threads, or shared drives, version chaos is inevitable.

What to look for:

  • Role-based workflows: Ensure the platform allows tailored workflows for regulatory teams, marketers, legal reviewers, etc., with permissions and responsibilities clearly defined.
  • Real-time collaboration: Look for tools that support live annotations, comment threads, and simultaneous review—across geographies.
  • Audit trails and version history: Every change must be traceable, timestamped, and reversible. This is critical for both accountability and audit-readiness.

Takeaway: The platform should centralize all activities, eliminate confusion, and increase velocity without compromising control. A modern collaborative artwork review tool should bring structure and clarity across your labelling lifecycle.

  1. Built-In Regulatory Intelligence

Why it matters: In pharma and related industries, packaging isn’t just marketing – it’s a regulated deliverable. Labels vary by country, language, product strength, and therapeutic area. A modern artwork automation platform must be compliance-first, not design-first.

What to look for:

  • Country-specific rulesets: Can it support country-wise compliance logic and adapt to local regulatory updates?
  • Validation gates: Before a label is finalized, the system should run automated checks based on current compliance templates.
  • Audit-readiness: It must be easy to generate evidence of approval timelines, stakeholder inputs, and validations.

Takeaway: Choose a platform that doesn’t just facilitate compliance – it enforces it. Look for AI in regulatory packaging that delivers automated decision-making built on global requirements.

  1. Seamless Integration With Your Existing Stack

Why it matters: Most enterprises already have PLMs, ERPs, DAMs, and regulatory systems in place. An artwork platform must integrate rather than disrupt, ensuring seamless data flow across your digital supply chain.

What to look for:

  • APIs and connectors: Ensure compatibility with your existing systems—SAP, Oracle, Veeva, or custom tools.
  • Single source of truth: The platform should ingest approved data (like regulatory texts, product info, images) from master sources and apply it contextually.
  • Cloud-native infrastructure: For remote collaboration, scalability, and global deployment, cloud-based platforms offer resilience and flexibility.

Takeaway: A modern platform must fit into your digital ecosystem—not require a complete overhaul. Look for packaging compliance software that complements your infrastructure.

  1. Built to Scale Across Global Teams

Why it matters: As portfolios expand and teams operate across time zones, the system must work as well for a single product update in Germany as it does for a product launch spanning 15 markets.

What to look for:

  • Multi-language support: From Arabic to Mandarin, the platform must handle diverse scripts, right-to-left formatting, and local legal text.
  • Template reusability: Can components be reused or modified for different SKUs, geographies, or strengths—without starting from scratch?
  • Performance at scale: It must support thousands of SKUs and artworks without slowing down or failing.

Takeaway: Don’t just plan for today’s needs. Choose a platform that scales as your business expands—and supports comprehensive label lifecycle management.

PACKX Checks Every Box — and Then Some

Many platforms claim automation, but few deliver compliance-driven intelligence at scale. PACKX is purpose-built for industries where precision and regulation are non-negotiable, such as life sciences, CPG, and medical devices, PACKX offers:

  • AI-powered proofing and auto-validation
  • Compliance-led templates and workflows
  • Region-specific logic and approval routing
  • Seamless team collaboration with full traceability
  • Scalable infrastructure for enterprise-grade deployment
  • Integration-ready APIs to connect with your PLM, ERP, and regulatory stack

Whether you’re facing recurring artwork delays, regulatory pressure, or costly errors—PACKX brings clarity, speed, and trust to every label. It’s more than a tool; it’s a complete pharmaceutical label automation solution designed for the future.

Don’t Just Automate—Elevate Your Entire Labelling Ecosystem

In regulated industries, the label is your last line of defense—and your first consumer impression. A simple packaging error can trigger costly recalls, regulatory sanctions, or worse, risk patient safety.

A modern artwork automation platform isn’t just about digitizing steps or saving time. It’s about creating a connected, intelligent, and compliant labelling ecosystem that keeps pace with market complexity and regulatory change.

Ask yourself: Is your current platform protecting you—or exposing you?

Use this checklist to evaluate where you stand. Then, choose a platform partner who doesn’t just promise automation but delivers resilience, accuracy, and scale—like PACKX, the leading solution in Pharma artwork management and medical device labelling platforms.

Why OCR Accuracy Matters: The Cost of Mistakes

In the fast-paced digital world, where data is the backbone of decision-making, businesses increasingly rely on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology to process and extract information from vast amounts of documents. OCR is considered one of the key enablers of digital transformation, enabling organizations to convert physical documents into accessible digital data.

However, not all OCR solutions are created equal. While basic OCR systems can help read and extract text from scanned documents, their accuracy can vary widely. The OCR accuracy impacts the overall quality of extracted data ans processes that depend on it, and ultimately the business’s bottom line.

Inaccurate OCR = Business Risk

Inaccurate document processing leads to errors in data, causing operational disruptions, increased costs, and damage to a company’s reputation. OCR accuracy matters, and here’s why the cost of mistakes can be significant:

  1. Financial Implications of OCR Errors

For many businesses, OCR errors aren’t just an inconvenience—they can translate into direct financial losses. Most organizations rely on automation platforms that include OCR as a foundational component to process financial documents, invoices, and contracts. However, if the OCR component is inaccurate, it can create cascading errors throughout the automated workflow.

Invoice Errors: Consider a scenario where a finance team uses an Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) system to process invoices. If the OCR layer misreads an invoice total, payment terms, or vendor information, the company could accidentally overpay or underpay. Worse still, missing key fields like taxes or early payment discounts can delay processing and impact cash flow.

Contract Misinterpretation: In legal workflows, OCR is often responsible for the first step—digitizing and extracting key terms. If inaccuracies occur here, they can carry through contract review tools or compliance checks, leading to flawed interpretations, legal exposure, or missed deadlines.

Operational Costs: Poor OCR accuracy increases the need for manual review and correction downstream. Even in sophisticated IDP workflows, time and resources must be diverted to catch and fix mistakes. This reduces productivity and weakens the ROI on automation initiatives.

  1. Customer Experience at Risk

The accuracy of OCR within automation workflows directly impacts how customers experience your services. An error introduced by OCR early in the document lifecycle can ripple into customer-facing processes—leading to delays, incorrect communication, or billing issues.

Invoice and Billing Issues: Customers receiving invoices generated from inaccurate OCR outputs may find incorrect totals, missing details, or wrong references. While the system may automate document generation, the quality of that automation depends heavily on the OCR’s ability to extract data correctly in the first place.

Delayed Service or Errors in Orders: In industries like retail or logistics, OCR powers the initial intake of forms, order sheets, or shipment requests. If the OCR component misinterprets these documents, it can lead to downstream automation triggering incorrect actions—like sending the wrong items, scheduling delays, or duplicating orders.

A flawed OCR layer in your automation stack may be invisible to customers, but its effects certainly aren’t. Inaccuracies erode trust, delay service, and ultimately harm customer retention.

  1. Legal and Compliance Risks

In highly regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and legal services, accuracy in document automation isn’t optional—it’s a matter of compliance. OCR plays a foundational role in these workflows, powering data extraction for systems that manage tax records, patient files, and contracts. If OCR introduces errors early in the automation pipeline, the consequences can be legally and financially severe.

Healthcare Compliance: In healthcare, OCR is used within automation platforms to extract patient data from forms, insurance documents, and medical records. Any error at the OCR stage can lead to incorrect or incomplete data flowing into electronic health record (EHR) systems. This could trigger HIPAA violations, impact patient care, or erode trust.

Financial Reporting: In the financial sector, OCR is often the first step in processing documents like tax returns, compliance filings, and audit reports. An inaccurate OCR output can corrupt downstream data analytics and reporting tools—leading to compliance breaches, audit flags, or regulatory penalties. In high-stakes environments, even a single field misread can cause substantial risk.

  1. Reduced Efficiency and Increased Error Propagation

OCR technology streamlines operations by reducing manual data entry. But when OCR accuracy is poor, it does the opposite—creating bottlenecks and increasing the likelihood of error propagation throughout your automated systems.

Manual Interventions: When an OCR engine misinterprets content, teams often have to manually verify and correct outputs within the broader automation flow. This manual intervention defeats the purpose of deploying automation in the first place and slows down processing times, reducing overall ROI.

Cascading Errors in Integrated Systems: Inaccurate OCR doesn’t just cause isolated issues—it affects every downstream system that relies on its output. For example, if OCR misreads a figure in an invoice, that faulty data could influence accounting entries, tax computations, and audit readiness. The more deeply integrated your systems are, the more widespread the impact of a single OCR error becomes.

  1. The Importance of Choosing an Accurate OCR Solution

To avoid the aforementioned risks, it’s crucial to choose an OCR solution that provides high levels of accuracy. While standard OCR technology can help with basic text recognition, it’s often limited in its capabilities to handle complex documents or ambiguous data. It’s vital to look for an OCR system that incorporates advanced AI and machine learning capabilities, like AOTM OCR, that can:

  • Adapt to Complex Documents: Recognize text in multi-page documents, complex layouts, and even handwritten notes.
  • Understand Context: Provide deeper contextual understanding to accurately extract and categorize data.
  • Automatically Correct Errors: Use AI to detect and correct errors in real-time, improving overall accuracy.
  • Process Multiple Languages: Offer multi-language support to extract data from documents in different languages with high precision.

By implementing an advanced OCR solution with AI-powered capabilities, businesses can ensure that their document processing is as accurate, efficient, and error-free as possible.

The Cost of Mistakes vs. The Value of Accuracy

OCR mistakes may seem minor at first, but their ripple effects can impact a business in many ways: from financial losses and customer dissatisfaction to legal liabilities and operational inefficiencies.

In today’s business environment, where data is gold, OCR is a critical component of automation and digital transformation. But the true value of OCR technology isn’t just in its ability to extract text—it’s in how accurately it does so. Choosing the right OCR system, like AOTM OCR, ensures that businesses extract, process, and utilize data with maximum precision, minimal errors, and greater efficiency.

Digital Preservation Challenges: Why METS and ALTO Are Essential for Large-Scale Archival Projects

Imagine discovering a centuries-old manuscript, brittle and broken at the edges. Now imagine being tasked to digitize and add it to your library’s collection—not just as a scanned image but as a fully searchable and preserved digital asset. That’s the kind of challenge libraries and archives worldwide face as they move from print to pixels.

These digital preservation initiatives are sometimes large scale, running into several years because it isn’t simply scanning. Without proper structuring, metadata, and text encoding, digital collections risk becoming unsearchable, unusable, or even obsolete. That’s where METS (Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard) and ALTO (Analyzed Layout and Text Object) come in.

The Scale of the Challenge: Libraries as Data Giants
Major libraries and archives house millions—sometimes hundreds of millions—of items, with ongoing digitization efforts processing thousands of pages daily. Large-scale projects require more than high-resolution scans—they need interoperability, structured metadata, and full-text accuracy for users to meaningfully engage with the content.

Here’s the problem:

  • A simple image-based digital archive lacks context. A TIFF scan of a rare book is just a picture unless it’s properly indexed.
  • Poor OCR (Optical Character Recognition) results mean users can’t search the text accurately—especially in historical or non-Latin scripts.
  • If metadata isn’t standardized, collections become data silos, limiting interoperability across institutions.

METS: Bringing Structure to Digital Archives

METS is like a blueprint for digital objects. Instead of just storing a document, METS binds together multiple components—images, OCR text, metadata, and structural relationships—ensuring that a digitized book or newspaper is more than just a stack of files.

Why METS Matters:
Structural Mapping – Defines the order of pages, chapters, or multi-volume works.
Preservation Metadata – Ensures long-term digital viability by tracking technical details and provenance.
Interoperability – Enables seamless exchange across repositories (Europeana, HathiTrust, DPLA, ProQuest, JSTOR).

Think of METS as a librarian’s guide for the digital world—a way to organize and ensure long-term usability of complex digitized collections.

Why ALTO is the Unsung Hero of Searchability

OCR alone isn’t enough. Standard OCR might extract text, but it loses layout details—crucial for newspapers, tables, and manuscripts. ALTO fixes that.

What ALTO Does Differently:

  • Retains Text Layout – Captures columns, footnotes, and even marginalia, making digitized newspapers or periodicals look like their physical counterparts.
  • Improves Search Accuracy – Maps text positions to original layouts, reducing OCR errors.
  • Supports Multilingual & Historical Texts – Handles complex scripts, Fraktur fonts, and even handwritten materials.

Example: As the Exclusive Partner for ProQuest’s Historical Newspapers Program (HNP) since 2001, we have digitized iconic publications like The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and many more. Using METS/ALTO, we have structured 28 million pages across 55 newspaper titles—some dating back to 1764—ensuring that every article, photograph, and advertisement is fully searchable and meticulously preserved. Our solutions not only safeguard history but also create revenue opportunities through content distribution and digital accessibility across tablets, smartphones, and emerging platforms.

Fun Fact: Digital Archives Are at Risk—Even Digital Ones!

Did you know that NASA lost the original high-resolution recordings of the 1969 moon landing? The tapes were overwritten due to poor archival practices. Digital doesn’t always mean permanent—without proper structuring (like METS/ALTO), even digital archives can disappear over time.

Future-Proofing Archives with METS & ALTO

In an era where digital libraries are growing exponentially, METS and ALTO are non-negotiable. They make sure that today’s digitization efforts remain accessible and meaningful for decades—even centuries—to come.

For libraries, archives, and cultural institutions, the choice is clear: Digitize, but do it right.

Ninestars: Bringing Structure to Digital Archives

At Ninestars, we go beyond digitization—we ensure archives are structured, searchable, and future-proof. Our solutions include AOTM OCR, indexing, and metadata enrichment to enhance content discoverability.

With METS, ALTO, MARC, and Dublin Core-compliant workflows, we’ve digitized 1.2 billion pages to date, making vast collections accessible across libraries, enterprises, and institutions. Our expertise spans subject- and keyword-based indexing, AI-powered OCR for handwritten texts, and contextual OCR in 71 languages for unmatched accuracy.

From national archives to rare manuscripts, we help organizations preserve history while unlocking new revenue and digital opportunities. Let’s talk.